As the global climate crisis progresses, so do strategies to make the Earth more sustainable and limit these impacts. Two examples of solutions for iso solar energy that do without the use of fossil fuels for energy production and reforestation. Now, a study has found that the solar energy strategy is even more effective in restoring lost vegetation.
Read more:
Global Warming: Solar Pains Vs. forests
Although both strategies will benefit the environment by returning to native vegetation and reducing the use of polluting fossil fuels, researchers would like to understand which compensates more.
This is because by replanting forests, the vegetation absorbs carbon from the air and turns it into oxygen, but it also darkens the Earth’s surface and increases the absorption of heat. The same goes for your sun pain.
Therefore, we decided to measure the albedo of the surface, which corresponds to the proportion of solar radiation reflected from it, to understand which method balances the advantages and consequently takes less time.
Result
- For this reason, albedo is measured in the solar field in the hyperarid region of the Arava Valley and in the Yatir Forest, both in Israel.
- In the first case, two solar pains, or the equilibrium point, occur after about 2 years and a month.
- They found it to be about 50 times faster than the same break-even point of replanted forests.
- Yet another investigation, published on the spot Tech XploreHowever, it is not very big on wet land and solar power continues to be considered preferable.
- However, it is emphasized that the importance of forests goes beyond mitigating global climate change, but also includes ecosystems, climate regulation and social services.